Arguments for and against city surveillance cameras
One of the most widely-used tools in the control of crime is perhaps the security camera. Ever since the unveilling of these devices, and their subsequent instalment in many homes, offices, and other spaces, our security has become stronger than ever. Security or surveillance cameras are used for many purposes, such as monitoring what goes on in the area, playing back videos to see what occurred previously, and recording and storing video footage for future reference.
It’s no wonder that security cameras are now being used as powerful evidence in courtroom cases and other kinds of disputes. For this reason, the hot topic of debate when it comes to security cameras is where to draw the line when installing them in certain places.
While the use of security cameras aren’t a problem in private places, there are some who protest the use of these cameras in public places like streets and alleyways. In fact, it is a matter of security vs privacy in most cases, as many generally do not like being recorded without their consent.
Arguments for and against public surveillance
What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a city surveillance system in Singapore? Let’s dive right into some arguments.
Against: Public surveillance systems are expensive. Security cameras are expensive. Installing them will mean more money out of your government’s wallet.
For: Reduces the crime rate. Evidence shows that neighbourhoods with security cameras have lower crime rates.
Against: They can be abused for other purposes. You don’t know how the footage is used until it is used. They can be used to monitor you.
For: Provides evidence and clues to catch criminals. Cameras provide damnable evidence when catching criminals.
Panasonic Security Solutions offers only the best in security equipment and solutions for your homes and other spaces. See more about our VMS software and other products here on our website!
